• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki 1995 or 1997 E&M Guidelines Initial/subsequent Hospital

calorom2

Networker
Messages
66
Location
Liverpool, NY
Best answers
0
There is a debate between coders in our office as to which Guideline (95 or 97) is better suited when coding Initial/Subsequent Hospital and Initial/Subsequent Observation for our Cardiologists. Do any of you consistently use one or the other or find one to be more beneficial than the other? Just wanted to get a few opinions.

Thanks!
 
Top