• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki 2 hr observation

Alicia Scott

Guru
Local Chapter Officer
Messages
248
Location
Barnett, MO
Best answers
0
I was asked about a case where a patient was not seen in the past 5 yrs and came to the office for high B/P. He was given clonidine (pill form) and observed for 2 hrs. The patient was a self pay and the doctor wished to use a code for an established patient so he wouldn't be charged as much.

This is just a scenario I was asked about. What in the world would you code for that? :(
 
I was asked about a case where a patient was not seen in the past 5 yrs and came to the office for high B/P. He was given clonidine (pill form) and observed for 2 hrs. The patient was a self pay and the doctor wished to use a code for an established patient so he wouldn't be charged as much.

This is just a scenario I was asked about. What in the world would you code for that? :(

A new patient code 99201-99205 based on documentation. I would not code established for reimbursement or any other reason if it clearly should be coded as a new patient. PERIOD. A provider has control over how much information is documented in the note. However, if they document a note with minimum information so a low e/m is billed and the patient gets sicker (high B/P leads to heart attack or stroke) they open themselves up for malpractice type issues.
 
Thank you

I have talked to the nurses and think that I explained it enough. I appreciate your comments. Many small offices I think feel they are not going to be audited because they are small but that is not true.
 
Top