• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki 2013 E/M & Incident To

Lassal423

Guest
Messages
70
Location
Denver
Best answers
0
Since the descriptions under E/M codes changed in 2013 to include NPP's, has anyone seen documentation from CMS that says the NPP MUST bill under their own NPI?

The question is whether or not a NPP can choose to bill either under their NPI, or as incident-to the physician (which is a higher reimbursement).

...and I assume that now they can bill for a New patient (where, in the past, the physician had to intiate the plan of care).

I'm looking for any citations on this.

Thank you!
Lora
 
this did not change the meaning of incident to. An NPP could always see a new patient as long as they bill under their own NPI. The incident -to definition still stands; An NPP must bill under their onw NPI unless the parameters of incident to have been met.
 
Top