• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki 25 Modifier Evaluation and Management

bkb1229

Guest
Messages
3
Best answers
0
I have been coding Podiatry for many years and Medicare has always paid the New Patient E&M service separately without appending the 25 modifier. It was my understanding that for a new patient a separate evaluation service is needed to determine the type of treatment (procedure) needed. Recently, Medicare has recouped amounts paid in 2011 for New Patient E&M codes that were billed in addition to an office procedure at the advice of a RAC. When I called, I was advised to submit a reopening form appending the 25 modifier to the original procedure code. Most of these evaluation services are for the same complaint and diagnosis. A full exam in addition to the procedure was needed because the patient was new to practice. Should the RACs be recouping this money? Should I advise my Provider to append the 25 to all NP OV codes billed in conjunction of an office procedure even if it is the same complaint and diagnosis?

Example: Complaint is wound. Full exam performed.
99203
11042
Diag= 707.15
 
Yes you need to have the 25 modifier on the E/M service every time the E/M is done with another service even on a new patient even if they diagnosis is the same. This is showing the insurance that you did both services. There are services that specialist can do without doing a E/M visit. Usually after the first visit they want to make sure that if you use the 25 it definably separate for E/M and the procedure.
 
Top