The spine surgeon did a re-exploration of hemilaminectomy at L5-S1 (63042) and a laminectomy at L3-4 and L4-5 (63047, 63048). I code according to RVU's. 63042 has a higher RVU than 63047. However, 63042 is bundled with 63047. Insurance is denying the 63042 as inclusive. From what I have found on internet, it is not appropriate to put 59 modifier on primary procedure. These procedures are done at different levels, and the surgeon should get paid for them. Does anyone have suggestions about this?
-
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
59 Modifier and RVU's - The spine surgeon did a re-exploration
- Thread starter khopstein
- Start date
RebeccaWoodward*
True Blue
- Messages
- 3,125
- Location
- Archdale, NC
Our practice is also affected by this payment methodology but unfortunatley, I see no way around it. 63042 has work RVU's of 18.61 63047=15.22
63047 has a payment status indicator 2. Therefore, most carriers will follow the payment policy below:
Standard payment adjustment rules for multiple procedures apply.
If a procedure is reported on the same day as another procedure with an indicator of 1, 2, for 3, you will need to rank the procedures by fee schedule (RVU's) amount and apply the appropriate reduction to the secondary codes (100%-50%-50%......)
Also...I don't see where NCCI edits bundle 63047 into 63042. I would append 51 to 63047. However, the multiple payment reduction will still apply.
63047 has a payment status indicator 2. Therefore, most carriers will follow the payment policy below:
Standard payment adjustment rules for multiple procedures apply.
If a procedure is reported on the same day as another procedure with an indicator of 1, 2, for 3, you will need to rank the procedures by fee schedule (RVU's) amount and apply the appropriate reduction to the secondary codes (100%-50%-50%......)
Also...I don't see where NCCI edits bundle 63047 into 63042. I would append 51 to 63047. However, the multiple payment reduction will still apply.
Last edited: