• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki 63052/63047

ms.bones206

Networker
Messages
26
Location
Evansville, Indiana
Best answers
0
I know what to do with the 22840 and the 22853. My questions is to confirm the 63047 at the L3-L4 because it doesn't have the arthrodesis/fusion. I'm ruling out 63053 because it doesn't have a fusion at that level and the 63048 because it can't be used without the 63047. I use the -59 because of the NCCI edit. It says NCCI-associated modifier can override the edit under appropriate circumstances - which I take this as a valid circumstance. Does anyone have a different/better/proven way to code this scenario? Thank you in advance.

L1 2 laminectomy with left-sided approach for stenosis

L3-4 laminectomy right-sided approach for stenosis

L4-5 laminectomy and fusion right-sided approach

22633 Level L4-L5
63052 Level L4-L5
63047 -59 Level L3-L4
63048 Level L1-L2
 
Well.. This is the correct approach to bill the above operative notes with XU modifier. Rest depends on the payer policy if they denied you can suggest for follow up with completed medical record's if patient having pre-authorization for all billed Cpt codes.
 
Top