Wiki Additional Levels of Laminectomy (CPT 63048)

dimplez

Networker
Messages
31
Location
Temple, TX
Best answers
0
As I understand CPT codes 63047/63048 are reported per vertebral segment with CPT stating that a vertebral segment describes the basic constituent part into which the spine may be divided. It represents a single complete vertebral bone with its associated articular processes and laminae. When providing this information to the coder, their response was "Laminectomies are coded by interspace or "level", not the individual vertebral body. L3-4 is coded 63047, L4-5 is coded 63048. See advice in AMA CPT assistant March 2022 SPINAL PROCEDURE UPDATES: "Reporting code 63048 along with parent code 63047 to represent work performed on only one segment (L1-L2) would constitute an overstatement of the work performed."

In reviewing the provided CPT Assistant (March 2022), I understand it to represent laminectomies AND fusion performed at the same level which is a misinterpretation of the intent of the statement she provided in rebuttal. Below is an operative report example where 63047 and 63048 were reported. Shouldn't it be 63047 and 63048 x2 or am I misunderstanding and advising incorrectly? Can someone please confirm??

Operative note:
patient was taken to the operating room and after induction of satisfactory endotracheal anesthesia, he was placed on the operating room table in the prone position on a Wilson frame and regular table. The lower back region was prepped and draped in a sterile fashion. A linear midline incision was made from the bottom of the spinous process of L2 down to the bottom of L5. The incision was carried down to and through the lumbodorsal fascia, following which the muscles were dissected in the subperiosteal plane to expose the lamina of L3, L4 and L5. Self-retaining retractors were added to maintain visualization. Fluoroscopy was used to confirm that we were at the appropriate levels. The spinous processes of L3, L4 and L5 were removed with a Leksell rongeur. The lateral edges of the lamina were identified at each level and then drilled through, using the drill until ligamentum flavum was encountered. We then elevated in successive fashion the L3, L4 and the L5 lamina away from the ligamentum flavum using the high-speed drill and Kerrison punches. The Kerrisons were then used to remove the remaining ligamentum flavum from the L3, L4 and L5 sublaminar space. The lateral recesses were inspected and freed up from their attachments to the dura with an angled curette. A large Kerrison punch was then used to open up the lateral recesses at L3-L4 and L4-5 by performing a medial facetectomy. The spinal canal was now very well decompressed. Hemostasis was accomplished with Surgifoam and bone wax along bony edges that were bleeding. The retractors were removed from the field and any bleeding points in the muscle coagulated. A medium size drain was left and sutured to the skin at its exit site. The deep muscle and fascia was closed with 0-Vicryl suture.
 
The operative note you provide describes a 2-level decompression, 63047, +63048.
Laminae and facets exist -between- vertebrae and are denoted by naming the vertebrae above and below. This was an L3-4 and an L4-5 decompression - two levels.
Fusions are performed similarly between two vertebrae and are similarly denoted.
A "segment" is a motion segment, not a vertebral body. The motion occurs at the disk and facet joints.
 
If you look in neurosurgery forum posts you will note that a motion segment is not defined by CMS or CPT, that is a definition that is from who? I cannot seem to find who or where that came from? Can you please name your source for this information?? CPT states "A vertebral segment describes the basic constituent part into which the spine may be divided. It represents a single complete vertebral bone with its associated articular processes and laminae. A vertebral interspace is the nonbony compartment between two adjacent vertebral bodies which contains the intervertebral disc, and includes the nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and two cartilagenous endplates."
 
You can look in the CPT book for pictures of laminectomy, and it is reprinted in the 3/2022 CPT-Assistant book - you can see how it lines up with an interspace and the resection involves both the superior and inferior vertebrae.

Motion segments are defined by WHO, by AMA, and through conventional understanding of spinal anatomy, and supported by SRS, NASS, etc. The definition of what is a motion segment is not a relevant question to a spine surgeon, it is understood, has been for decades, and is based on basic anatomy.

From the standpoint of CPT, the understanding of a segment for the purposes of decompression in the 6xxxx section is described a bit awkwardly from that in the 2xxxx section because instrumentation is performed into pedicles/vertebral bodies and so levels are denoted by the highest pedicle/vertebral body and the lowest. A "one level fusion" is from L4-L5. A "two level fusion" is from L4-S1, for eample. T10-Sacrum/Pelvis is an 8 level fusion (T10-11, T11-12, T12-L1, L1-2, L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, L5-S1).

Laminectomies are performed, by definition, on an interspace. That's where the lamina is. It is not level with the vertebral body, and overlaps with the posterior elements of the adjacent vertebra.
Arthrodesis is performed, by definition, on an interspace. That's what a fusion does - it eliminates motion/articulation at a joint.
This is basic anatomy, and those definitions are used throughout CPT in the 22xxx sections, for example.
 
Top