• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Arteriograms & runoff

dpumford

Guest
Messages
299
Best answers
0
Patient had a complex case which we did stent & PTCA's in the Rt leg. A runoff was also done also (75710-26)

Later that day pt was brought back to OR due to absent pulses and worseing ischemia. So again we did a 75710-26.

My question is, would it be incorrect to bill as a 75716-26 and not bill the 75710-26 twice. It is same leg, same day but different session."As I know one of these will get rejected. Each encounter will be on its own claim/episode.

The pt also had PTCA's done during each encounter; so would you code the the S & I (75964) for the 1st ptca done on return due to the fact pt had them done earlier in the day or should we just code 75962-26 then 75964-26 as you normally would do?

Have I confused you yet!:eek:

Thanks!
 
First, I would not combine anything from separate encounters even if they are on the same day. Code each Sx independently.
Second, I would add the 76 modifier to the codes for the second Sx. If they deny write an appeal explaining the circumstances....If Medicare is the payer you should not have a problem.
Hope this helps.

Michael D. Reyland, CPC, CIRCC
Surgical Specialists of Georgia
 
Top