• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Attempted AVR

dvance4210

Guest
Messages
96
Location
Pataskala, OH
Best answers
0
Name of Procedure: Exploratory median sternotomy in an attempt to perform aortic valve replacement.

....a median sternotomy was performed the same time that the endovascular equipment was inserted in the right lower extremity. The mediastinum was dissected. The pericardium was incised and marsupialized. Once we had exposed the ascending aorta on the heart, we noticed that the aorta was very calcified. We checked the extent of this calcification and noticed tht it was unsafe to cannulate this patient. In order to continue with the standard AVR, the patient will require peripheral cannulation and hypothermic circulartory arrest to also replace the ascending aorta. In view of this fragile clinical condition, we made the decision of not proceeding with the AVR and to abort the open heart procedure.

I wasn't sure whether I should bill the 33405-53 or should I bill with a sternotomy code. My gut feeling tells me the 33405-53. Any input would be appreciated!
 
Hi,

I think I agree with 33405-53. I believe you're supposed to keep the primary diagnosis the same (whatever it was going to be for the AVR - ie: 424.1) and then add the extenuating circumstance as the 2nd dx., which in this case would be 440.0.

Lisi, CPC
eharkler@nmh.org
 
Top