• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Central Venous Catheter (perma cath insertion) question

Create Wiki
C

Chlrtrep

Guest
Messages
160
Best answers
0
I am new to a facility and noticed that they do not charge/code for Fluorscopic guidance (77001) when implanting a tunneled permacath(36558). And it seems to be hit and miss with US guidance (76937).

I reviewed 15 charts and none for (77001) allthough the physicians dictation clearly static the use of Fluorscopic guidiance.

Of those charts 8 had documented in physician"s dication the use of Ultrasound for guidance for vasculalr access. Of those, 3 had (76937) coded/charged.

I asked the department why they are not coding/charging consistently and one staff member said they are medicare patietns so it does not matter we are not getting money for it anyway.So...

If I am reading a report that states permacath(36558) implanted and physicians clearly has documented in his report the us of "fluoroscopic guidance" and the use of "Ultrasound guidance"

I would code 36558,76937,77001 correct.... What are your thoughts
 
Chlrtrep said:
I am new to a facility and noticed that they do not charge/code for Fluorscopic guidance (77001) when implanting a tunneled permacath(36558). And it seems to be hit and miss with US guidance (76937).

I reviewed 15 charts and none for (77001) allthough the physicians dictation clearly static the use of Fluorscopic guidiance.

Of those charts 8 had documented in physician"s dication the use of Ultrasound for guidance for vasculalr access. Of those, 3 had (76937) coded/charged.

I asked the department why they are not coding/charging consistently and one staff member said they are medicare patietns so it does not matter we are not getting money for it anyway.So...

If I am reading a report that states permacath(36558) implanted and physicians clearly has documented in his report the us of "fluoroscopic guidance" and the use of "Ultrasound guidance"

I would code 36558,76937,77001 correct.... What are your thoughts
Click to expand...

For u/s guidance, make sure they say that an u/s image was taken. I would code it all. It doesn't make a difference who the insurance is, the only way payment is different is if the patient is an in-patient (DRG's). Out-patient pays by the procedure.
Thanks,
Jim Pawloski, CIRCC
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top