• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki chief complaint-I have been auditing

suzannereed

Guest
Messages
65
Best answers
0
I have been auditing an endocrinologist and for all of his established patients the chief complaint reads "Here for follow up evaluation. Endocrinologic." Is this satisfactory, or does he or his staff need to mention diabestes, thryoid, etc.? Please let me know what you think. Thanks in advance.
 
Sufficient

It's sufficient - but not optimal.

The chief complaint, technically, is what the PATIENT would say he is there for. "Follow-up" would about cover that.

However, in an ideal world, the physician would use this to give the coder/auditor some clue as to the reason for the visit. "follow-up for DM2" or "Post-op follow-up" are two VERY different reasons for a follow-up appointment.

Hope that helps.

F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC
 
Top