• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Coding Grades of Esophagitis Question

Cpg26b

Guest
Messages
3
Location
Centralia , MO
Best answers
0
Coding Grades of Esophagitis Question

When a Diagnosis is listed as Grade “x” Esophagitis with no additional detail, what DX code(s) would you assign for each of the below grades?

-If there’s not one base code for each, would you code a base NOS or Other (K20.80/K20.90) and add erosion, ulcer, Barrett’s, etc.?
The Savary-Miller grading system commonly used:
Grade 1: single or multiple erosions on a single fold. Erosions may be exudative or erythematous.
Grade 2: multiple erosions affecting multiple folds. Erosions may be confluent.
Grade 3: multiple circumferential erosions.
Grade 4: ulcer, stenosis, or esophageal shortening.
Grade 5: Barrett's epithelium. Columnar metaplasia in the form of circular or non-circular (islands or tongues) extensions.

The more recent and more objective Los Angeles grades A to D classification is also used:
Grade A: one or more mucosal breaks no longer than 5 mm, none of which extends between the tops of the mucosal folds.
Grade B: one or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm long, none of which extends between the tops of two mucosal folds.
Grade C: mucosal breaks that extend between the tops of two or more mucosal folds, but which involve <75% of the mucosal circumference.
Grade D: mucosal breaks which involve ≥75% of the mucosal circumference.
 
If the documentation only included a 'grade' and no more detail, I would simply use the NOS code K20.90. A grade is a severity and not a specified type of esophagitis, so I don't think K20.80 is correct. Standard coding guidelines generally don't allow for external or outside references such as these grading systems - you just have to stick with what the provider has documented in that patient's record. If you add specificity for a grade that isn't backed up in the medical record itself, I don't think it would hold up in an audit.
 
Top