Hi everyone,
I am auditing some ophthalmology charts and have come across one that showed under CC/HPI: "borderline DM" for several years...it was coded 249.00 for those years. Then, in 2008, the chart showed "diabetes" under HPI and was coded 250.00.
First of all, shouldn't 'borderline' be treated the same as a 'rule out' situation and as such, should NOT be given a definitive diagnosis? This patient may never have developed DM, yet he has been labeled as having it years before it was actually confirmed.
Secondly, the patient has no diabetic retinopathy, no problems whatsoever related to his diabetes. His visit is purely to check his vision due to presbyopia which he has had for years. On the most current encounter, the doctor linked the DM code, 250.00, to his E/M charge, but then linked the charge for progressive lenses (V2781GA) to Presbyopia, 367.4.
Is that normal for ophthalmology coding?
I would really appreciate input on these questions...I just want to be sure I have a complete understanding here before moving forward!
Thanks in advance!
Susan
I am auditing some ophthalmology charts and have come across one that showed under CC/HPI: "borderline DM" for several years...it was coded 249.00 for those years. Then, in 2008, the chart showed "diabetes" under HPI and was coded 250.00.
First of all, shouldn't 'borderline' be treated the same as a 'rule out' situation and as such, should NOT be given a definitive diagnosis? This patient may never have developed DM, yet he has been labeled as having it years before it was actually confirmed.
Secondly, the patient has no diabetic retinopathy, no problems whatsoever related to his diabetes. His visit is purely to check his vision due to presbyopia which he has had for years. On the most current encounter, the doctor linked the DM code, 250.00, to his E/M charge, but then linked the charge for progressive lenses (V2781GA) to Presbyopia, 367.4.
Is that normal for ophthalmology coding?
I would really appreciate input on these questions...I just want to be sure I have a complete understanding here before moving forward!
Thanks in advance!
Susan