• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Discontinued due to death

beachgrl62

Networker
Messages
27
Location
Caldwell, ID
Best answers
0
Trying to decide if this should be billed. Patient had been given some meds via IV. Went to OR, anesthesiologist inserted tube but general not started, pt. coded before procedure started. I don't believe it should but just wanting to get a second opionion. Thanks
 
if you are asking whether the general surgeon can code anything, no based on your scenario. If he for instance, started a colonoscopy but could not complete it due to poor patient prep, then yes you would code the procedure with a 53 modifier 53.
 
if you are asking whether the general surgeon can code anything, no based on your scenario. If he for instance, started a colonoscopy but could not complete it due to poor patient prep, then yes you would code the procedure with a 53 modifier 53.
 
Are you asking if the anesthesiologist can bill for services. The answer is yes. If the procedure was cancelled prior to induction but after the pre-anesthesia exam then this can be billed as an E/M visit (ex: 99231), if it was cancelled after induction then the procedure CPT code would be billed with the -53 modifier. Although as a side note - many payers are beginning to no longer accept this modifier.

I hope this helps
 
Top