• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki E & M bullets

Create Wiki
melzinser

melzinser

Guest
Messages
70
Location
Columbus, OH
Best answers
0
I am auditing E & M for an orthopedic practice. There is a common phrase used in many physical exam dictations: "both lower (or upper) extremities are neurovascularly intact." There is a great debate by the providers as to how many "bullets" should be given for this. I know what they are implying, but as an auditor, what should I credit this statement with?
 
None

Personally I would give NO bullets for that phrase, as I have no idea what - exactly - was examined. There is no "neurovascular" system ...

Was the physician looking for signs of edema? (1 bullet cardiovascular, IF so specified)
Was the physician checking deep tendon reflexes? (1 bullet neuro, IF so specified)
Was the physician examining muscle strength and tone? (2 bullets - one for EACH leg, IF so specified).

Hope that helps

F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top