• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki E/M Emergency Physician with procedure

williak

Guest
Messages
1
Best answers
0
I code ER facility and now new to coding ER professional fee. I know on the facility side you can code an E/M level with Mod 25 for a procedure, say a laceration repair. But I'm getting mixed info on if you can code the E/M with a laceration repair for the physician fee/billing in the ER. Since nearly every ER visit the patient is new it would seem that the E/M would always be coded because each patient has to be evaluated and history taken before any decision is made for tests and/or treatment. So my senario would be: patient comes in to ER with a finger laceration. The doctor examines and evaluates the patient and repairs the laceration and sends patient home. would it be correct to code the laceration repair and the E/M level with Mod 25????? Please advise!! Thanks much!
 
Per the NCCI Policy Manual, the criteria for modifier 25 needs to have supporting documentation of a significant, separate E&M service. A minor procedure has preoperative evaluation included in the work of the procedure. This means a brief E&M=pre-procedure evaluation, so if the provider does a more extensive History and Exam they need to document why it was indicated. Your example seems straightforward and not really significant from pre-procedure work, based on the information from CMS I would be hard pressed to support a separate E&M. There is no specifically published information that ED profee services should be considered differently, just because you can report a separate E&M with a modifier 25, doesn't mean you should; it all depends on what the documentation supports. But I remain open for additional information on that issue.

NCCI Policy Manual, Chapt 1, General Correct Coding Policies, page I-17, final 2014
....the minor surgical procedure is separately reportable with modifier 25. The E&M service and minor surgical procedure do not require different diagnoses. If a minor surgical procedure is performed on a new patient, the same rules for reporting E&M services apply. The fact that the patient is “new” to the provider is not sufficient alone to justify reporting an E&M service on the same date of service as a minor surgical procedure. NCCI contains many, but not all, possible edits based on these principles. 1 General
 
Last edited:
You can absolutely bill for the laceration repair with the E/M. However, a modifier -25 shoud not be appended because the reason for the ER visit was the finger laceration. In this case the repair is not an incidentally separate service. I agree with the previous post on the use of modifier -25.
 
Top