• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki EM levels-Insect bite/stings

amexnikki23

Guest
Messages
65
Location
Carolina Beach, NC
Best answers
0
I have an EM guideline sheet developed by 'E/M University' that our practice utilizes; it's basically the same as the CMS EM guidelines. In the risk table it gives insect bites as an example of a self-limited or minor problem, yet every provider I audit for (10+ providers) consistently use a 99213 each and every time, and will even use a 99203 on a new patient. I can justify this when maybe inflamed, warm to the touch possibly infected, some labs run for suspected viruses, etc. but in the case of a simple insect bite, no tests run, no signs of infection of imbedded stingers or bug parts, etc., wouldn't this just be a straightforward MDM with minimal risk? Our providers almost NEVER ever code a 99212. Just wondering if what others are seeing out there. Thanks!
 
I have an EM guideline sheet developed by 'E/M University' that our practice utilizes; it's basically the same as the CMS EM guidelines. In the risk table it gives insect bites as an example of a self-limited or minor problem, yet every provider I audit for (10+ providers) consistently use a 99213 each and every time, and will even use a 99203 on a new patient. I can justify this when maybe inflamed, warm to the touch possibly infected, some labs run for suspected viruses, etc. but in the case of a simple insect bite, no tests run, no signs of infection of imbedded stingers or bug parts, etc., wouldn't this just be a straightforward MDM with minimal risk? Our providers almost NEVER ever code a 99212. Just wondering if what others are seeing out there. Thanks!

Based on the documentation you described above. You have my vote and I agree.
New Prob no work up = 1
Nothing reviewed = 0
Table of risk = Minimal

SF MDM
 
I agree.

I was talking to one of my providers...explaining to him why I had to down-code one of his encounters to a 99212 (it was a similar situation) and he stated "I thought that any time I walk in the room it was an automatic 99213".

we then proceeded to have a discussion of the requirements of an E&M visit.

I still find he needs a reminder about once a year or so.
 
I agree for an insect bite, with no issues and nothing prescribed, I would give straightforward medical decision making.
I had one provider that charged a 99214 for an insect bite and the only thing that was said to the patient was he could use ice to reduce the swelling.
 
Top