• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Exam 95 Guidelines

Messages
152
Best answers
0
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: Demonstrates a 6 feet 4 inch, 282 pound with a body mass index of 33. His blood pressure is 140/84. He is accompanied today by his wife. The patient is noted to have warm, well perfused hands with 2+ palpable radial pulses bilaterally. Range of motion of the wrist, MP and IP joints is grossly normal. He has a positive Tinel sign over the median nerves in both wrists. He does show some mild flattening of the thenar eminence on the right hand-side though his grip strength is overall excellent. No formal 2-point discrimination tests or grip strengths were performed today. His nerve conduction studies were reviewed.

Hi, all

I coded the above exam as detail base on 95 DG, I could see 3 systems on the note, CEMC syudy guide says...
EPF EXAM ( 2-7 Organ Systems/Body Areas Limited )
Detail EXAM ( 2-7 Organ Systems/Body Areas in Detail )
Can someone confirm this...
 
Last edited:
Agree

Keeping in minid that the 95 DG's allow for a wide interpretation, I would agree with this as I saw at least four points made for the nervous system. Some payers/MACs would want to see at least 4 or 5 systems/areas documented with the detail, some want more points. But just IMO, I would say there is enough detail here to warrant it. If someone says EPF based on some other payer's guideline, I wouldn't say he or she is wrong either. The great grey area of the 1995 exam!
 
Keeping in minid that the 95 DG's allow for a wide interpretation, I would agree with this as I saw at least four points made for the nervous system. Some payers/MACs would want to see at least 4 or 5 systems/areas documented with the detail, some want more points. But just IMO, I would say there is enough detail here to warrant it. If someone says EPF based on some other payer's guideline, I wouldn't say he or she is wrong either. The great grey area of the 1995 exam!

Thank you Lance, for your valuable interpretation and making it clear.
 
Top