• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Exam documentation - Conjunctivae/Lids: within normal limits

AT2728

Expert
Messages
325
Location
Perryville, MO
Best answers
0
We have a new dermatologist to our office, following is how she is documenting her exam:

General Appearance: well-developed, well nourished, no apparent distress
Mood/Affect: cooperative
Orientation: alert and oriented x 3
Scalp/Hair: within normal limits
Head/Face: macule on left mandible
Conjunctivae/Lids: within normal limits
Lips/Teeth/Gums: within normal limits
Oral Mucosa/Tongue: within normal limits
Neck/Thyroid: within normal limits
Right Upper Extremity: within normal limits
Left Upper Extremity: within normal limits
Nails/Digits: within normal limits

So, I'm confused by her documentation. Would this be expanded based on 95 and 97 guidelines? Any advice would be much appreciated! For the 97 I was giving a point for RUE and a point for LUE, but unsure if this is accurate.
 
Derm exam

I actually would say it is a detailed exam. Per 97guidelines you have 12 bullets, you are correct by giving 1 for each extremity that was examined. If you use 95 then it will depend on your interpretation of detailed vs. expended problem focused. Some carriers consider examination of 2-4 body areas/organ systems an EPF exam and 5-7 a detailed exam. Others consider 2-7 body areas/organ systems for both EPF and Detailed, so it becomes rather subjective how to interpret EPF vs. Detailed exam. Yet I'd still say it is a detailed exam.

Sofia Delmas, MS, CPC
 
Top