• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki EXCLUDES 1 CLARIFICATIO

Create Wiki Sort by votes
T

tmekelburg1978

New
Local Chapter Officer
Messages
4
Location
Muskegon, MI
Best answers
0
I'm having an issue with this specific Excludes 1 problem:
  • M20.4 (Other hammer toe(s), Acquired) shows Q66 (Congenital deformities of feet) in the Excludes 1; However, Q66 does not have the M20.4 codes in their Excludes 1.

Why does a code appear in the Excludes 1 column of one code, but it's not true in the converse?

Can someone clear this up for me? Thank you.
 
0
Unfortunately it's just a fact of life that there are inconsistencies and illogical things in ICD-10. This is just one example - there are plenty of others like this. I did read an article in one of the coding publications a while back - I can't locate it now - that described many of the confusions resulting from the excludes notes in ICD-10 and said that their organization had been working with the WHO/CDC to try to get clarifications and revisions made. But as with any large bureaucracy, this will of course be a slow process.

As coders, we have to do the best we can with these things in the meantime. I would treat the excludes note as applicable to the code pair and just follow the guidance - that if the two codes are referring to the same documented condition then they shouldn't be coded together, but if they're clearly two separate conditions and unrelated, then it's appropriate to code both.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top