Wiki Gastroenterology Coding Specifically 43248 and 43239

jessirussell2003

Contributor
Messages
10
Location
Dunkirk, Ohio
Best answers
0
We are now getting a frequent flow of denials, upheld denials after sending in NCCI Edits report, OP/Path notes and reconsideration letter for coding 43248 and 43239 together including the ins specific modifier. So I am asking for guidance as to how these should be billed. The ins companies are upholding denials d/t the 43248 (Dilation) and the 43239 (EGD w/BX) being both performed in the esophagus. It makes sense that yes they both are performed in the esophagus however you can't do a dilation with bx equipment and you can't do a bx with dilation equipment. So I totally feel this is fightable with the ins companies. I have previously added to my reconsideration letters about the equipment being different for each of those procedures and now just within the last month I am seeing the upheld denials based on they are both performed in the esophagus. I am looking for answers so we can fight these and get them paid. I thank you in advance. Jessica
 
43239 needs XU this is more specific than modifier 59 and is two separate procedures. Now if not done on the same site then 43239 would need XS instead.
 
Top