• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Legal vs ethical dilemma

coderica2011

Guest
Messages
6
Best answers
0
Is a billing co legally obligated due to contract with doctor to submit charges to ins co's (esp. Medicare) even though they are aware that the doctor is committing fraud & is on "payment hold" because of an oig audit?
 
You are submitted claims that you know are fraudulent?? Even if you are under contract you cannot submit claims that you know are incorrect, your choices are send it back for revision, refuse to submit, or correct it before submission.
 
OIG has a Compliance Guidance document for 3rd party billing companies.
In part, it says: "If the billing company finds evidence
of misconduct (e.g., inaccurate claim
submission) on the part of the provider
that they service, the billing company
should refrain from the submission of
questionable claims and notify the
provider in writing within thirty (30)
days of such a determination. This
notification should include all claim
specific information and the rationale
for such a determination.
If the billing company discovers
credible evidence of the provider's
continued misconduct or flagrant
fraudulent or abusive conduct, the billing company should: (1) Refrain
from submitting any false or
inappropriate claims; (2) terminate the
contract; and/or (3) report the
misconduct to the appropriate Federal
and State authorities within a
reasonable time, but not more than sixty
(60) days after determining that there is
credible evidence of a violation.
 
Top