• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Mod 24 use follow up with new problem

Create Wiki
P

patt1018

New
Messages
7
Location
Quincy, MA
Best answers
0
Hello

I was wondering if anyone could provide some feedback on the use of modifier 24. A patient had surgery on his left elbow and was seen in the office again within the global period for follow up. The provider submitted records and in the record it states the patient was there post-op but the patient had a complaint about his right hand/elbow and felt that he may need surgery on this side also because he didn't realize how much pain he was in until after the surgery to the left side. My colleague disagrees that the modifier 24 is appropriate and we should not pay the claim based on the global period. However, I believe the modifier 24 is appropriate for this visit even though it was a f/up to the surgery because it was discussed that he had a "new" problem.

Any feedback is appreciated.
Thanks
 
Modifier -24 is definitely appropriate in this case since it is a problem unrelated to the surgery.
I will note the level should be determined by looking only at the documentation regarding the right hand/elbow. For example, if the provider orders testing of left elbow or discusses pathology from the left elbow surgery, that does not get counted in leveling.
An E/M with -24 is justified and should be paid, based on the level related to the right hand/elbow.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top