Patient came in for PO visit for eye surgery but on exam new issue found on non-surgery eye and procedure required. Would both modifiers 24 and 25 be acceptable?
-
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
Wiki Modifier 24 vs 25 during PO visit
- Thread starter Sonia.hidalgo@flhosp.org
- Start date
RyanRaichCPC
Guest
Yes, that would be perfectly fine.
- Messages
- 7
- Best answers
- 0
Modifier 24 is used when unrelated E&M is carried on during the post-op period. In this scenario, patient presented to get the procedure performed (the means post-op period has not started yet); hence, to me... modifier 24 is not valid in this case.
thomas7331
Guest
It is acceptable, and will also be necessary. If the service is in the global period of a previous procedure also on the same date as a new procedure, then you will need both modifiers in order to get the E&M paid. Assuming that documentation supports both modifiers, then both are appropriate.