• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki modifier 91

phastings

Guest
Messages
4
Best answers
0
We are dermatologist clinic with a lab to process slides. We bill CPT 88305 globally when our lab processes the specimen and our doctor reads it. Often times our physicians will do multiple surgeries and will process and read some slides but will decide to send out one of the slides to a pathologist. In that case, we bill 88305 for the global specimens and bill 88305-TC for the slide sent a pathologist. In some cases we have to appeal because the 88305 ?TC is bundled into the 88305. We recently received a suggestion to not bill globally at all but to bill all our paths as 88305-26 and 88305-TC -91. Would this be an appropriate way to bill? Any suggestions?
 
I don't think 26 and TC should be used together in this way... See this link to the WPS modifier fact sheet.

http://www.wpsmedicare.com/j8macpartb/resources/modifiers/modifier-tc.shtml

I worked at a hospital previously that billed the global service and had a contract to pay a separate pathologist in some cases. Outside of a contract arrangement I'm not sure what other options there are.
 
Last edited:
Top