• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Modifier TC

BMICHAUN

Guest
Messages
23
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Best answers
0
Is it appropriate to add modifier TC to pathology codes on facility claims UB04, if so can you give documentation to support this
 
I would check with the commercial carrier on their policy. If the code allows for TC modifier, and it is itemized then it can be appended to the UB-04. This is especially important if you are only billing for the Technical and the professional is outsourced.

AHA while the owner of the UB-04 does not define or restrict how a CPT code is appended to the form. So if it is compliant coding to add a modifier to a CPT code on a UB-04 then my recommendation is to add it. Transparency is the best policy.
 
Most payers will not reimburse a professional fee on a UB-04 claim, and the very few that do will require that the professional fees be billed under a different revenue code which will identify it as such. (The TC of a pathology will be billed with revenue codes 0310-0319 whereas the PC would use revenue code 0960-0989). Standard practice across the industry is to bill and pay all professional services using the 1500 form - to do otherwise is a very rare exception.

So I think there is very list risk in omitting the TC modifier from UB-04 claims because, as CodingKing says, it is understood that this is what is being billed on a UB claim. But there is also likely no harm in adding if you feel it is necessary or your payer requires it.
 
Top