wfriddle
Networker
My providers are not understanding the logic behind some of the reimbursement policies out there and I am having a hard time coming up with a straight answer that everyone is happy with. I understand there is a list of procedures that are subject to the multiple procedure reduction but does that mean that those procedures will never pay at 100% when billed with another more expensive procedure? If so what is the point of modifier 59? Is it only to overide a mutually exlusive relationship of procedures? If I have two procedure that are perfomed by different methods on different organ systems does that not in fact qualify as two distinct procedures? I am confused and the more research I do the more confused I get. Can anyone help with billing multiple procedures and when they should and shouldn't be reduced? I know my providers do not want to be missing out on money for services they performed but I also don't want to waste a whole lot of time on a hopeless cause. I want to make sure that I am billing correctly and getting my providers the money they deserve and have the knowledge to explain to them when I can not. I am struggling with this one.