If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
I'ts hard to say without seeing a copy of the note. Is there documentation of MDM? What level HPI/ROS is audited? Did the physician document that >50% of the 20" was in counseling and coordination of care?
I think we'd need more info to give you a straight answer. Pam
No exam - not billable. I have spoken to several compliance auditors and read several published resources, Trailblazer, Edgeblast, Dec 2000/Orthopedic Coding Alert, etc. that clearly document that documenting time does not negate the need for the physician to complete all 3 of the elements required by CPT descriptions. Time can be a controlling factor, only.
If the PE is missing you use the 99499 E/M unlisted code.
The doctor doesn't document ANY type of exam, not even an observation of "appears well", or such that can be counted under constitutional? Even with something that minimal, it could be an exam element, therefore resulting in all three elements being documented. Then, if all the requirements are met for time-based code assignment, you could go forward?
I haven't seen a note without at least one constitutional element documented. Seems that much would be present....
I agree it is hard to say without the note. But if it is an established patient he does only need to meet or exceed 2 out of the three key criteria. So it is possible that this could be a 99213.