• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Operative Reports

NPSDEB

Networker
Messages
40
Location
Duluth, MN
Best answers
0
We just had an ICD 10 meeting with our physicians and we were discussing that documentation for ICD 10 has to be more specific. I pointed out that when they document the Pre and Postoperative diagnosis on the op report they have to list the diagnosis as they did for the consult. For example patient is coming in for breast reduction for back pain, neck pain, shoulder grooving and intertrigo. All of these diagnosis were listed in the initial consult for the patient. When they dictate the operative report they just say "symptomatic macromastia" for both pre and postoperative diagnosis. We are wondering if we have to relist the reasons for the surgery (back/neck pain, ect) or if the macromastia is enough. Or if they document "as documented in my previous notes" if that will be enough.
 
Top