• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Paracolostomy hernia mesh complication

bmcduo2

Guest
Messages
15
Location
Daytona Beach
Best answers
0
Help! I'm really stumped by this one, and would appreciate others' review and opinion.

Medicare pt had a colostomy revision and incarcerated peristomal hernia repair w/mesh 7-9-08, which was coded as 44346; 49568. Then, on 7-14, pt admitted postop w/abdominal pain & wound drainage complications. Op report shows surgeon removed infected mesh, repaired hole in small bowel (Proc note - Repair Enterocutaneous Fistula?) and used AlloDerm to replace mesh for hernia defect. However, operative note states "not a recurrent hernia".

Surgeon's office entered 99222-57; 44640; 11008; 49568.

Really don't think 99222 is appropriate since global complication. Need help on other codes....44640-79 w/10180-78 & 11008? Haven't found any appropriate way to code for Alloderm mesh replacement, since 49568 doesn't have qualifying primary proc and isn't allowed w/11008 due to CCI.

Thanks everyone for taking a look at this.

Barbara :confused:
 
When I checked the CCI, it stated no bundling issues exist for 11008 and 49568. In fact the notes in CPT state: When insertion of mesh is used for closure, use 49568. So you should be able to bill these together and you shouldn't need a modifier, except for the return to the operating room (78/79 which ever is appropriate for your situation). I put all the codes you mentioned into the CCI and it stated that no bundling issues exist. (44640, 49568, 11008 & 10180)
 
Last edited:
When I checked the CCI, it stated no bundling issues exist for 11008 and 49568. In fact the notes in CPT state: When insertion of mesh is used for closure, use 49568. So you should be able to bill these together and you shouldn't need a modifier, except for the return to the operating room (78/79 which ever is appropriate for your situation). I put all the codes you mentioned into the CCI and it stated that no bundling issues exist. (44640, 49568, 11008 & 10180)
Thanks for your help. While I didn't find any CCI bundling issue between 11008 & 49568, I did see where only 11004-11006 were allowed as qualifying primary px(s) to use with the 49568 mesh add-on code.
 
Top