Regaring an ASC who operates with paper charts and a mix of physicians: some sign operative reports electronically (system requires an addendum for post‑sign edits) and others sign printed notes by hand. Looking to implement a concise, audit‑safe policy that clarifies the query process and who is responsible for updating operative reports or creating addendums after a coder query.
Seeking guidance on who may draft operative report updates or addendums after a coder‑initiated query. Specifically: is it acceptable for coders or staff to transcribe a clinician’s handwritten note into an electronic addendum, or must the physician personally enter and sign the addendum? When the system allows staff edits to an operative report, are staff permitted to transcribe clinician handwriting and update the original note, and then have signed by the physician before it becomes part of the legal record? What documentation remains in the paper chart for appeals, the original operative report (with any handwritten notations), the written query, and the clinician‑signed addendum, or some other combination?
Any insight is greatly appreciated.
Seeking guidance on who may draft operative report updates or addendums after a coder‑initiated query. Specifically: is it acceptable for coders or staff to transcribe a clinician’s handwritten note into an electronic addendum, or must the physician personally enter and sign the addendum? When the system allows staff edits to an operative report, are staff permitted to transcribe clinician handwriting and update the original note, and then have signed by the physician before it becomes part of the legal record? What documentation remains in the paper chart for appeals, the original operative report (with any handwritten notations), the written query, and the clinician‑signed addendum, or some other combination?
Any insight is greatly appreciated.