• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Review Of Systems Documentation

Create Wiki
B

bigfishbobby

Contributor
Messages
11
Location
Bristol, TN
Best answers
0
I remember recently seeing some guidance stating that positives for the ROS should be stated individually and not just in the HPI. I cannot find it anywhere and cannot remember if it was from the OIG or CMS. Am I crazy or just google challenged?
 
The ROS doesn't have to be broken out under a separate heading, it can be included in the HPI in a paragraph format. Same goes for PFSH. There is nothing in the documentation guidelines regarding how HPI, ROS and PFSH should be formatted - although some carriers don't allow "double dipping" by counting the same element as both HPI and ROS.
 
Ros

I think that is in the e&m evaluation guidelines on the cms website. I use this a lot! Hope that helps.

Josie J., CPC, CPC-H
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top