• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki ROS Statement

mistygirl

Contributor
Messages
17
Location
Somerset, MA
Best answers
0
I am studying for the E/M certification and I am struggling with the ROS. I was told it is okay to list each system and put "not present" and list a possible condition. Example; Respiratory Not Present-crackling, wheezing, cough. Thank you
 
The guidelines say the ROS should list the positives and pertinent negatives, so 'not present' is a negative which would be acceptable. However, I'd caution that this sounds like exam documentation and not ROS, so I would take a closer look at this note before deciding. Remember that the ROS consists of questions asked to the patient about their symptoms whereas the exam is the provider's observations. Providers usually document the ROS as 'denies wheezing' or 'negative for cough' to record negative responses, but 'not present' sounds more like an observation. Also, 'crackling' is something a provider would try to hear on an exam, not something they would ask the patient about.
 
Last edited:
Top