• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki spinal neurostimulator coding/billing

alysn1drlnd

Guest
Messages
46
Location
Fayetteville, NC
Best answers
0
I have a client that has coded/billed 63650, 63650-59, C1897, C1897...

They have also submitted w/o the -59 on another account. One account is paid more than the other, my question is: Is it appropriate to use the -59 in this scenario? It is not a NCCI edit so not sure the modifier is necessary, however with modifier reimbursement is more...don't want to break any rules...any help is appreciated. Thanks
 
Modifier -59 Billing Guidelines

Reimbursement without the -59 modifier was less because the insurance carrier applied the multiple procedure discount (50%) for the 2nd CPT code. Carriers vary as to how they process claims with the -59 or -51 modifier. Multiple procedure guidelines usually pay 100% of the allowed amount for the 1st procedure and 50% of the allowed amount for the 2nd and subsequent procedures. Add-on codes are exempt from this rule and depending on the payor -59 modifier is also exempt. Which would be why your claim with the -59 modifier was paid more.
 
Thanks! That's what I was thinking, but I just wanted to be sure because that code is not subject to multiple discounting (or so it says lol). Thanks again!:D
 
Top