• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Spinal Surgery question

Messages
18
Location
Friendswood, TX
Best answers
0
Need advise Please. Doctor did a TLIF at L3-L4 and L4-L5 on the left. Also, did a Posterolateral fusion on the left side at L3 and L4. Then he did Laminotomy at L5-S1 with foraminotomy.
I billed 22633, 22634, 22853 (2 units). I also billed 63052 and 63053 for Laminectomy during interbody fusion for the levels L3-L4 and L4-L5. I billed 63030-59 for the laminotomy. BCBS denied the 63030-59 stating inconsistent with the modifier used. I called BCBS and of course they we no help, they said to just file a corrected claim for that code. What is there to correct? L5-S1 should be paid because it is not part of the fusion thus modifier 59 added for distinct procedural service Any advise is appreciated so I can refile the claim. Thank you.
 
TO clarify 2 level TLIF with decompression and interbody device 22633,22634,22853 X2,63052,63053 (instrumentation, bone graft) coded and submitted with appropriate Diagnosis attached (e.g., stenosis, listhesis, spondy) then you coded 63030-59 L5-S1 with separate appropriate Diagnosis attached (e.g., herniation)? Denial was inconsistent modifier. Did you look at the BCBS modifier policy on the provider portal? Do they prefer XU/XS over -59? Are they requiring LT/RT because this code is appropriate for -50? Payers in my area changed a lot of policies last quarter on preference. I would start there. It may be a simple educational opportunity for the staff on BCBS policy. If submitted per that policy I would submit reconsideration letter attaching that policy. hope this helps.
 
Top