• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Subsequent Inpatient Visits

VSMichael

New
Local Chapter Officer
Messages
9
Location
Macon, GA
Best answers
0
I was recently informed by a fellow coder that in order to code for a level 3 subsequent hospital visit, there has to be no less than 4 diagnoses in the Provider's Assessment/Plan. This coder stated that if fewer than four diagnoses were listed in the Assessment/Plan part of the note, even if the MDM supported a level 3, then only a level 2 could be coded.
Does anyone know if this is correct? Thank you in advance!
 
There is no such rule that I ever seen or heard of - I would have to say that this is incorrect information. It may be an internal guideline specific to the practice where this coder works - some places come up with rules of thumb like this to try to prevent billing a higher level than is medically necessary, but this is not standard, and in my opinion would not be a correct coding practice. Each visit note must be evaluated on its own merits to determine the correct level.
 
Last edited:
There is no such rule that I ever seen or heard of - I would have to say that this is incorrect information. It may be an internal guideline specific to the practice where this coder works - some places come up with rules of thumb like this to try to prevent billing a higher level than is medically necessary, but this is not standard, and in my opinion would not be a correct coding practice. Each visit note must be evaluated on its own merits to determine the correct level.


I had never heard of that either. Thank you so much for your prompt reply! :-)
 
Top