• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Use of 59 and 51 modifiers TOGETHER?

kmonte

Contributor
Local Chapter Officer
Messages
22
Location
Aurora
Best answers
0
Our provider did procedures 29881 and 29875 - 59 on a patient. Insurance denied stating 26875 was bundled into 29881. We disagree and are appealing. I ran it through Ingenix and it shows that we should append w/ a 51 not a 59. Someone then stated that we need to append w/ BOTH the 59 and 51. :eek: I have never seen these two used simultaneously. Just wanted to see if any of you guys had anything to support that this can be done. This is a Cigna patient.

Thanks!
 
Our provider did procedures 29881 and 29875 - 59 on a patient. Insurance denied stating 26875 was bundled into 29881. We disagree and are appealing. I ran it through Ingenix and it shows that we should append w/ a 51 not a 59. Someone then stated that we need to append w/ BOTH the 59 and 51. :eek: I have never seen these two used simultaneously. Just wanted to see if any of you guys had anything to support that this can be done. This is a Cigna patient.

Thanks!

You don't report 51 and 59 together. For 29875 you need a 59 mod. Was it in a separate compartment from 29881? If so, appeal, if not it's inclusive..
 
Top