Advanced Search

Cardiology Coding Alert

Denial Prevention:

80 Percent of Vascular Study Claims Are Wrong, Reveals NGS Review

Published on Fri Jun 10, 2016

You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.

Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:

Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Cardiology Coding Alert

Denial Prevention:
80 Percent of Vascular Study Claims Are Wrong, Reveals NGS Review
Would your duplex scan coding pass the test? If you report non-invasive vascular studies, it's [...]

ICD-10-CM:
Sequence Z Code First on These CABG Mapping Claims for NGS
Linking scans to preprocedure encounter codes is the key to compliant coding. You already know [...]

Code Edits:
Need Another Reminder You Can't Report INR Codes? CCI 22.1 Answers the Call
Reporting 99363, 99364, or G0250 with these inpatient E/Ms will trigger a denial. Medicare doesn’t [...]

Modifier:
Turn to Modifier 32 When Outside Party Has Power to Mandate a Service
Don’t assume this modifier is for E/M only. In some cases, your cardiologist may perform [...]

You Be the Coder:
Put Prolonged QTc Question to Rest
Question: Which ICD-10-CM code should I use for a prolonged QTc interval? Indiana Subscriber Answer: The correct [...]

Reader Question:
Prep for New National JW Rule
Question: I heard there's finally a single rule about how to use modifier JW. What is [...]

Reader Question:
Make Room for New Echo Cat. III Code
Question: Are there any Category III codes expected for cardiology this July? South Dakota Subscriber Answer: One [...]

Reader Question:
Check 93641 Modifier 51 Exempt Status
Question: I have a question from the May 2016, vol. 19, no. 5, Cardiology Coding Alert, [...]

Reader Question:
Base POS on Face-to-Face Setting, Usually
Question: If I’m coding for the PC of a test performed in an outpatient hospital, do [...]

View All