Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

READER QUESTIONS:

Weigh Your Mod 22, Unlisted Code Options

Question: In the past month, we have had two cases of laparoscopic IUD removal due to the IUD perforating the uterine wall. The ob-gyn could not remove it vaginally. Incidentally, though, the ob-gyn performed both removals in conjunction with 58671. My surgeons want to bill an additional charge for the laparoscopic removal of the IUD (for which we would have to use an unlisted procedure), but my coding staff feel that adding modifier 22 to 58671 is more appropriate. Who is right? Florida Subscriber Answer: Either way conveys the same message (and delays payment of the claim). The unlisted code you would use is 49329 (Unlisted laparoscopy procedure,abdomen, peritoneum and omentum). Coding experts, however, prefer 58671-22 (Laparoscopy, surgical; with occlusion of oviducts by device [e.g., band, clip, or Falope ring]; Increased procedural services). --  The answers for Reader Questions and You Be the Coder provided by Melanie Witt, RN, CPC, [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

View All