• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Screening Colon

Peke

Networker
Messages
38
Location
Sumner, TX
If a patient comes in for a screening colon dr.does cold forcep biopsy for something unrelated to polyps such as proctitis and proctitis is not a payable dx for colon? What would you bill?
 
Hi :)
As the patient comes for screening colonoscopy, dx V76.51 should be primary followed by dx Proctitis 569.49

Swetha.B.D, CPC
 
Last edited:
Hi :)
As the patient comes for screening colonoscopy, dx V76.51 should be primary followed by dx Proctitis 569.49

Swetha.B.D, CPC
I agree...V76.51 primary and 569.49 secondary. There is a Medlearn Matters publication (SE0746) that advises you to only link diagnosis 2 (the abnormal finding) to the procedure, but still show the V76.51 on the claim...our billing system doesn't allow us to do that...does anyone else have that problem?
 
MelodyCPC,

We had that exact issue, we had to work with the programmers for our billing system and get a work around on this issue.

Erica
 
I have run into this situation as well. The only way to get this paid that I am aware of is to change this to the G code, either G0105 or G0121 for high-or-low risk. You don't get paid for the biopsy, but at least you get paid. Maybe we are doing it incorrectly, but this is the only way that I am aware of that you can get paid from Medicare in this situation.
 
Top