• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki New Patient visit vs Cerumen removal only

Create Wiki
V

VanettaP

Contributor
Messages
12
Location
Lakeland, FL
Best answers
0
Hello All,

Does anyone know if I should bill a new patient office visit for a NEW PATIENT that visits and has cerumen removed during that visit. I am being told by an auditor that I should bill the procedure 69210 instead of a 99202 for the new patient visit. Can anyone provide proof of how this scenario should be billed? I am at a loss trying to find a rule about this.

Thank you,

Vanetta
 
if that is why the patient is coming in and for nothing else other than the removal of the cerumen impaction, yes that would be correct if there is not any medically necessity to code the office visit as well then you cant.
 
trose45116 said:
if that is why the patient is coming in and for nothing else other than the removal of the cerumen impaction, yes that would be correct if there is not any medically necessity to code the office visit as well then you cant.
Click to expand...

My issue is the patient is new to my provider. The patient only suspects they have wax in their ear. This wax was confirmed in the exam. Is it unreasonable bill for a new patient visit only? I am not trying to bill both. I want to bill New Patient instead of the procedure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top