- Messages
- 1
- Location
- Tyrone, NM
WE ARE RECEIVING DENIALS STATING THAT EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT CODES BUNDLE WITH X-RAY COES. WE HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED THIS UNTIL RECENTLY. DOES THIS SOUND CORRECT THAT THEY BUNDLE? I HAVE NOT HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT THIS
Agree! Humana Medicaid is pulling this denial nonsense.What are the diagnoses, X-Ray codes, and E/M levels being billed? Does your office bill for the global XR also (meaning you own the equipment and your doc is interpreting the XR)? I think I would want more specific info on the health plan (is it only one or many?), how many claims are you talking about (has anyone run data analytics on the #?), and the type of practice specialty your group is.
Having to append a 25 to an E/M just because an XR was done sounds insane. Then, if you do that, next thing you know you'll be hit with a modifier 25 audit or auto-denial because of increased utilization of modifier 25 for no reason. You can't just blanket append a 25 on everything for no reason.
UHC just released a policy update that they were requiring the submission of a separate x-ray report when billed with an E/M same day. I wonder if this is related. We haven't had any denials as of yet, but are trying to prepare for them. Maybe submitting the x-ray documentation with a cover letter that the x-ray interpretation was not used to level the E/M and therefor is separately billable will help? I'll be interested to see what others are doing. Good luck!Our office received 4 denials for this reason in the past week. All from UHC, has anyone tried to appeal this decision and what was your argument?
UHC is also automatically applying 26 & TC modifiers without requesting records, watch your payments!Sending additonal documenation will not help. Our practice is doing so and they are still adding TC and 26 modifiers themselves and paying at lower rates. UHC policy was updated 04/01/2026. 25 modifier is discussed in this but we have no tried yet, was hoping the documentation submitted would support billing globally.
If anyone discovers a correction to this, please share your wisdom.