Hi, our pain doc frequently performs arthrocentesis with depo injection and aspiration and joint arthrogram under fluoroscopic guidance in the same session.
The note reads:
Under the guidance of fluoroscopy 3.5 inches G22 was inserted into bilateral hips, then 1cc of IC-Vue was advanced through the needle into bilateral hips, the dye distributed unevenly indicative of severe inflammation, there seemed no evidence of any intra-auricular fractures, then 40 mg of depo-medrol with 2ccs of Marcaine were injected into bilateral hips.
We bill with 27093, 20610 59, and 73525. My doc insists this is correct for what he is doing, however, some of our payers will not allow 20610.
I know there is a CCI on these codes, but he feels the 59 is correctly used.
Is this how it should be billed, and any tips on the payer issue?
The note reads:
Under the guidance of fluoroscopy 3.5 inches G22 was inserted into bilateral hips, then 1cc of IC-Vue was advanced through the needle into bilateral hips, the dye distributed unevenly indicative of severe inflammation, there seemed no evidence of any intra-auricular fractures, then 40 mg of depo-medrol with 2ccs of Marcaine were injected into bilateral hips.
We bill with 27093, 20610 59, and 73525. My doc insists this is correct for what he is doing, however, some of our payers will not allow 20610.
I know there is a CCI on these codes, but he feels the 59 is correctly used.
Is this how it should be billed, and any tips on the payer issue?