• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki 52214 or 52235?

toria11

Guru
Messages
206
Location
Clearwater, FL
Best answers
0
The doctor would like to bill 52214 and 52310 for the service described below, but I'm not sure it would be appropriate. I know the 52310 is bundled and cannot be billed. Would the biopsy be included in 52214? Thanks!!

PROCEDURE PERFORMED:
1. Cystoscopy with extraction of bladder calculus.
2. Bladder biopsy with fulguration of biopsy site and biopsy lesion (medium size).

PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
1. Severe irritative voiding symptoms.
2. Bladder calculus.

POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
1. Severe irritative voiding symptoms.
2. Bladder calculus.

DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:
After successful induction of anesthesia, the patient was placed in the lithotomy position. Her perineum was sterilely prepped and draped. A #21 scope was placed in the meatus and passed proximally towards the bladder. The urethra was normal. The trigone was normal. Inspection of the bladder showed an 8 to 9 mm spear-like calculus in the posterior wall. Inspection of the rest of the bladder showed marked edema with multiple superficial ulcers and hemorrhagic regions potentially consistent with interstitial cystitis. Using the biopsy forceps, the stone was extracted first. Then, attention turned towards the lesions. The lesions were extremely friable and bled very easily. Approximately 20% of the bladder mucosa was involved with these lesions and the largest measuring approximately 4 cm in diameter posteriorly. Again, they appeared to be ulcerative and extremely hemorrhagic. Using the cold cup biopsy forceps, a biopsy was taken of 1 of these lesions to make sure she did not have carcinoma in situ or urothelial carcinoma. Next, the rollerball was used to fulgurate the biopsy site. However, since she was having significant bleeding from most of the bladder due to these lesions, each of the bleeding points were also fulgurated using the roller electrode. At the end of the procedure, there appeared to be no evidence of active bleeding. There was no evidence of perforation. The scope was then removed
and a 3-way Foley catheter inserted with ease. The effluent was clear and the patient was taken to the recovery room in good condition having tolerated the procedure well.
 
I would suggest the following codingfor your clinical scenario:
52214 for the fulguration of the multiple bladder areas of bleeding, and
52204-XU for the bladder biopsy and fulguration of the bladder biopsy sit.e
 
Top