• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki 99213-25 with 46600

maine4me

Guru
Messages
177
Location
Perkasie, PA
Best answers
0
A general surgeon I work for billed a 99213-25 with 46600. I asked for the notes because the patients plan denied the 46600 as inclusive to the 99213. In reviewing the notes it appears to me that only the E/M should have been billed. There is no mention of a scope of any kind in the notes, and the notes states that only the perianal skin was examined. I have attached the note below, please let me know if I am on the right track.

Status Report: Patient had I&D of perianal abscess (Office, 1/28/11, 1/31/11). No anal fistual was identified. After that surgery, patient healed nicely. Patient has now noted "something up inside my anus that prolapses and retracts post wiping." He notes occasional rectal bleeding and denies any further drainage from his prior abscess. He denies any fever.

Exam: Perianal skin only: Wound is closed and no longer draining. There is no surrounding erythema, induration, or tenderness. There is no abscess cavity. The previous right perianal induration and erythema is resolved. There are minimal external hemorrhoids.

Plan: 1. Sitz baths p.r.n.
2. RTO here p.r.n.
3. Patient advised to keep stool soft.
 
Provider didn't document properly

If the provider would have documented that anoscopy was done, then the 46600 could have been billed with the 992xx.

That's how I'm understanding things, anyway.
 
Top