• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Adenopathy in Cancer

Create Wiki
L

LuckyLily

Guru
Local Chapter Officer
Messages
138
Best answers
0
If a patient has cancer, and provider states the patient also has lymphadenopathy (from reviewing the imaging) would it be appropriate to code the lymphadenopathy as lymph mets?

My thoughts would be no. Lymphadenopathy does not equate to lymph mets. However others are telling me yes.

Any thoughts would be helpful.
 
I do not code lymph mets unless there is a biopsy proving so or the clinician clearly states so in the notes. I would code the lymphadenopathy as documented - R59.0-R59.9
If the provider did not make the leap to lymph mets, then I certainly won't. It's a possible (or even probable) diagnosis, which is not coded as the disease for outpatient. Similarly, when a patient first presents and you suspect cancer, you code the signs/symptoms until you have a confirmed diagnosis.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top