AlishaFEC
New
- Messages
- 2
- Location
- Flushing, NY
We recently started performing Bravo pH studies in our ASC and are seeing a consistent denial pattern from commercial and Medicaid payers.
Claim setup:
As an example, for Healthfirst Our ASC agreement reimburses ambulatory surgical procedures at a flat rate of $655 per procedure and references CMS reimbursement policies, including the Multiple Endoscopy Reduction Rule. However, I have not been able to locate any ASC policy stating that 91035 is packaged into 43239.
Questions:
Claim setup:
- ASC facility billing
- UB-04 for commercial/Medicaid
- Revenue code 0490
- CPT 43239 (EGD with biopsy)
- CPT 91035-TC (Bravo capsule pH monitoring technical component)
- Same DOS as capsule placement
- Professional claim for 91035 mod 26 is billed separately on date of interpretation and is being paid
- 43239 pays
- 91035-TC denies with CO-97
- No additional remark codes
- Appeals are being upheld as "service included in case rate"
- other ways of refiling w/ mod TC and 59 have the same outcome
- CPT pair 43239/91035 has NCCI modifier indicator 9 (no active edit)
- Medicare pays both services
- Professional component of 91035 is being paid
- Denials are occurring across multiple commercial and Medicaid plans
As an example, for Healthfirst Our ASC agreement reimburses ambulatory surgical procedures at a flat rate of $655 per procedure and references CMS reimbursement policies, including the Multiple Endoscopy Reduction Rule. However, I have not been able to locate any ASC policy stating that 91035 is packaged into 43239.
Questions:
- Has anyone successfully obtained separate ASC facility reimbursement for 91035 when billed with 43239?
- Are commercial plans commonly packaging the technical component of 91035 into the ASC case rate?
- Are you billing 91035 with or without modifier TC on institutional ASC claims?
- Has anyone identified a CMS, ASC, or payer policy that specifically supports bundling 91035 into the primary EGD procedure?