I need some help from the experts on diagnosis documentation using an EHR.
Our pediatric & family practice providers pick all of their diagnoses. We have a great EHR program that makes it very easy to search all possible diagnoses by keywords. The problem is that the providers sometimes tend to be a little quick and lazy about picking the correct diagnosis, and some don't know the coding guidelines for things that are outside the ordinary.
As a result, half of the diagnoses they choose are the "other" or "unspecified" codes. I review the more complicated claims before they go out and often have to add or correct diagnoses. However, the providers rarely name their diagnosis in the assessment area of the chart. There's only a diagnosis code with the description listed in the ICD book, so I'm constantly having to "query the provider" for clarification.
When I perform audits I'm not sure what to think about that. From an experienced auditor's point of view, would that stand up as acceptable documentation?
I fear this is going to create even more problems as we get into ICD-10...
Our pediatric & family practice providers pick all of their diagnoses. We have a great EHR program that makes it very easy to search all possible diagnoses by keywords. The problem is that the providers sometimes tend to be a little quick and lazy about picking the correct diagnosis, and some don't know the coding guidelines for things that are outside the ordinary.
As a result, half of the diagnoses they choose are the "other" or "unspecified" codes. I review the more complicated claims before they go out and often have to add or correct diagnoses. However, the providers rarely name their diagnosis in the assessment area of the chart. There's only a diagnosis code with the description listed in the ICD book, so I'm constantly having to "query the provider" for clarification.
When I perform audits I'm not sure what to think about that. From an experienced auditor's point of view, would that stand up as acceptable documentation?
I fear this is going to create even more problems as we get into ICD-10...