If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
93650 was my gut instinct too, but after talking with my physicians they related that to ablate AV node re-entrant tachycardia they are not ablating the AV Node, instead they are ablating the accessory nodal pathway directly adjacent to the AV node. Thinking that this was done to create heart block or to alter the AV node function, I asked them if this was in order to alter electrical conductivity through the AV node. They said no, it is only to alter the electral conduction of the atrium. So they insist upon billing 93651. In the past we billed 93651 only for ablation of SVT, so I was/still am hesitant to bill this when the only diagnosis I have is 427.89 for AVNRT. Anyone else gotten into this disucussion before? Are you still billing 93650?