• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Clarification on Patient Status – Provider Transition Between Dermatology Practices

I’m seeking clarification regarding patient billing status in the following scenario:


If a provider transitions from one Dermatology practice to another within the same city and state, will their existing patients be considered new or established at the new practice?


Additional details:


  • At the previous practice, claims were billed under the provider’s individual NPI.
  • At the new practice, claims will be billed under the group NPI.

Does this change in billing structure impact whether the patients are classified as new or established?


Your guidance on this would be greatly appreciated.


Thank you,
 
The original doctor's patients are established if they see patients at the new practice within the three year period. The original doctor's patients are also established to all dermatologists at the new practice who are the same specialty and sub-specialty as the original physician.

I think of established patient status as being a highly contagious condition that easily spreads to other providers. :)

Your MAC likely has a new/established patient decision tree or tool. BCBS Rhode Island has some good examples https://www.bcbsri.com/providers/update/correct-coding-established-vs-new-patient
 
Top